Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
Just curious...I recently came across the formula =Sum(C3:C3). What's it doing? Why not just say =C3? Thanks -- smither fan |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 23, 9:57*pm, Ross wrote:
Just curious...I recently came across the formula =Sum(C3:C3). *What's it doing? *Why not just say =C3? Or at least =SUM(C3)? I can think of several reasons. The first and foremost: we find a lot of people who think they must put every expression in some function call. I don't know where that's coming from. Probably some "For Dummies" book ;-). However, there are a number of reasonable reasons for writing such formulas. For example, =SUM(C3) will be 0 even if C3 is text, whereas =C3 simply duplicates the text. (Alternative: the N() function.) =SUM(C3:C3) might have been the result of a wider range that was pared down by deleting rows or columns. If you start with =SUM(C3:C24) and delete the rows C4:C24, you end up with =SUM(C3:C3). |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PS....
While I offered some justification for the OP's specific example, there are other arcane examples that make little sense to me. For example, =SUM(A1-B1). I think this is clearly an example of my first explanation, namely a misunderstanding of what is needed to write an expression. Disclaimer: But I don't know the requirements of the many other spreadsheet applications that were popular in the past. I refreshed my memory of Visicalc, and I do not believe it required encapsulating expressions in a function call. I'm pretty sure that Multiplan did not, either. Don't know about Lotus, but I would be surprised if it does. ------ original posting ----- On Dec 23, 10:21*pm, joeu2004 wrote: On Dec 23, 9:57*pm, Ross wrote: Just curious...I recently came across the formula =Sum(C3:C3). *What's it doing? *Why not just say =C3? Or at least =SUM(C3)? I can think of several reasons. *The first and foremost: *we find a lot of people who think they must put every expression in some function call. *I don't know where that's coming from. *Probably some "For Dummies" book ;-). However, there are a number of reasonable reasons for writing such formulas. *For example, =SUM(C3) will be 0 even if C3 is text, whereas =C3 simply duplicates the text. *(Alternative: *the N() function.) =SUM(C3:C3) might have been the result of a wider range that was pared down by deleting rows or columns. *If you start with =SUM(C3:C24) and delete the rows C4:C24, you end up with =SUM(C3:C3). |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the insight. I think it is probably a leftover from a larger
range, as you said. Have good Holidays! -- smither fan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Identify if Cell is Formula or written number | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
How do I write a formula to convert numbers to written text? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
using the name of a worksheet written in a cell, inside a formula | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Is there a formula to change number value to the written value? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Is there a formula to convert numbers to written text in Excel? | Excel Worksheet Functions |