Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do I calculate simultaneous equations?
|
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you provide an example of what you have now and what you want to have
eventually? Regards, Ryan--- -- RyGuy "RL" wrote: How do I calculate simultaneous equations? |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
21x+ 6y = 10
(7x-20)^2+(6y+10)^2=200 I only know that the solution are not integers. "ryguy7272" wrote: Can you provide an example of what you have now and what you want to have eventually? Regards, Ryan--- -- RyGuy "RL" wrote: How do I calculate simultaneous equations? |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can probably done using Solver. I'm more used to Goal seek, so I rework to one variable
I use cell A2 for x and B2 for y. Reworking 21x+6y=10: x = (10-6y)/21 So the formula in A2 is: =(10-6*B2)/21 In B2 I put 10 (no special reason) In A3 the second equation: =(7*A2-20)^2+(6*B2+10)^2 With A3 selected: ToolsGoal seek, To value: 200, By changing cell: $B$2 I get 0.857143 for x and -1.33333 for y -- Kind regards, Niek Otten Microsoft MVP - Excel "RL" wrote in message ... | 21x+ 6y = 10 | (7x-20)^2+(6y+10)^2=200 | | I only know that the solution are not integers. | | "ryguy7272" wrote: | | Can you provide an example of what you have now and what you want to have | eventually? | | Regards, | Ryan--- | | | -- | RyGuy | | | "RL" wrote: | | How do I calculate simultaneous equations? |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RL, this may be of some interest to you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_equation -- RyGuy "Niek Otten" wrote: Can probably done using Solver. I'm more used to Goal seek, so I rework to one variable I use cell A2 for x and B2 for y. Reworking 21x+6y=10: x = (10-6y)/21 So the formula in A2 is: =(10-6*B2)/21 In B2 I put 10 (no special reason) In A3 the second equation: =(7*A2-20)^2+(6*B2+10)^2 With A3 selected: ToolsGoal seek, To value: 200, By changing cell: $B$2 I get 0.857143 for x and -1.33333 for y -- Kind regards, Niek Otten Microsoft MVP - Excel "RL" wrote in message ... | 21x+ 6y = 10 | (7x-20)^2+(6y+10)^2=200 | | I only know that the solution are not integers. | | "ryguy7272" wrote: | | Can you provide an example of what you have now and what you want to have | eventually? | | Regards, | Ryan--- | | | -- | RyGuy | | | "RL" wrote: | | How do I calculate simultaneous equations? |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Niek Otten" wrote...
Can probably done using Solver. I'm more used to Goal seek, so I rework to one variable I use cell A2 for x and B2 for y. Reworking 21x+6y=10: x = (10-6y)/21 So the formula in A2 is: =(10-6*B2)/21 .... Not enough algebra. This can be completely solved analytically. Just substitute your expression for x based on the first equation into the second equation. First simplify: 6y appears in both equations, so replace it with z = 6y. 21x + z = 10 (7x - 20)^2 + (z + 10)^2 = 200 z = 10 - 21x Then substitute the RHS for z in the second equation. (7x - 20)^2 + (10 - 21x + 10)^2 = 200 (7x - 20)^2 + (20 - 21x)^2 = 200 49x^2 - 280x + 400 + 400 - 840x + 441x^2 = 200 490x^2 - 1120x + 800 = 200 49x^2 - 112x + 60 = 0 So x has 2 solutions 56/49 + (3136/2401 - 60/49)^0.5 and 56/49 - (3136/2401 - 60/49)^0.5 and y also has two solutions. Solver will only find one, depending on the initial state of the variable cell. Also, the Solver solution is approximate while the analytical solution is accurate to machine precision. Finally, as any who uses numerical analysis in their job will tell you, if all it takes is 10 or fewer lines of algebra to reach an exact solution, that ALWAYS preferable to ANY iterative approach. |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<This can be completely solved analytically
I know, Harlan. Many complex problems can be solved analytically. We don't need computers at all, apart from solving crossword puzzles. But I'm sure I'm not alone in preferring an iterative approach if there is an easy one. If the first equation would have been more complex, I wouldn't even have tried. Ten lines of algebra is ten lines of possible errors. It is for me. I'm sure it is for some others. I'm certain it is for the many who are not familiar with the algebraic approach. I think your limit of 10 lines is just *your* figure. Nothing to do with an objective limit. I will not try to turn this forum into a math class. I admit there are posters who are better helped with some education, like in the many questions about percentages. -- Kind regards, Niek Otten Microsoft MVP - Excel "Harlan Grove" wrote in message ... | "Niek Otten" wrote... | Can probably done using Solver. I'm more used to Goal seek, so I | rework to one variable | | I use cell A2 for x and B2 for y. | | Reworking 21x+6y=10: | x = (10-6y)/21 | So the formula in A2 is: | =(10-6*B2)/21 | ... | | Not enough algebra. This can be completely solved analytically. Just | substitute your expression for x based on the first equation into the | second equation. First simplify: 6y appears in both equations, so | replace it with z = 6y. | | 21x + z = 10 | (7x - 20)^2 + (z + 10)^2 = 200 | | z = 10 - 21x | | Then substitute the RHS for z in the second equation. | | (7x - 20)^2 + (10 - 21x + 10)^2 = 200 | (7x - 20)^2 + (20 - 21x)^2 = 200 | 49x^2 - 280x + 400 + 400 - 840x + 441x^2 = 200 | 490x^2 - 1120x + 800 = 200 | 49x^2 - 112x + 60 = 0 | | So x has 2 solutions | | 56/49 + (3136/2401 - 60/49)^0.5 and 56/49 - (3136/2401 - 60/49)^0.5 | | and y also has two solutions. Solver will only find one, depending on | the initial state of the variable cell. Also, the Solver solution is | approximate while the analytical solution is accurate to machine | precision. Finally, as any who uses numerical analysis in their job | will tell you, if all it takes is 10 or fewer lines of algebra to | reach an exact solution, that ALWAYS preferable to ANY iterative | approach. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular References - Simultaneous Equations | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How do I do simultaneous AND and OR filtering ? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
simultaneous subtotals | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
solving for 2 unknowns using 2 simultaneous equations | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
solving for 3 unknowns using 3 simultaneous equations | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |