Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
Vlookup function 2003
Hi Guys,
My first post on the forums. I work for a small insurance company in the UK using MS excel for stochastic modelling. My company has been office 2000(!) for a ages, and have finally taken the 'plunge' and upgraded... to office 2003. So far so good - I like it :). Sadly, since the upgrade, most of our models run significantly slower, as in they take twice/three times as long to run. We are wondering if this could be something to do with the implemenation of the vlookup function. The increased slowness seems to be proportional to the number of vlookups we have in the model - this is speculative, but there does look to be a pattern. Does anyone know if the implemenation has changed Excel 2000 - 2003, or if this could be a reason? Are there any other suggestions or has anyone come across this before? Parts of the models would be hard (read very hard) to implement without the vlookup'ing up - but it would be nice to know so we can avoid where possible if this is the case. Thanks, Simon |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Combine VLOOKUP and IF function so #NA isn't returned as a value from VLOOKUP | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Help with VLookup in Excel 2003 please | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
HOW DO I NEST THE VLOOKUP FUNCTION WITH THE LEFT FUNCTION | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
how do I write a vlookup function within an iserror function so t. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
I want to use Vlookup function and AND function in a single formu. | Excel Worksheet Functions |