Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sandy Mann" wrote...
Harlan Grove" wrote in message I'm not a purist about separating all terms in SUMPRODUCT, but there's some value in separating the values summed from the criteria, so Debatable point. There seems to be a trend for people in the NG's to recommend comma separation which, I have read, is slighly faster but I have always been of the opinion that I would rather see an error returned than a zero which may go unnoticed. . . . When have I ever shied away from a debatable point?! Depends on whether one wants a numeric result from =SUMPRODUCT((Condition1)*...*(ConditionN),RangeToB eSummed) when =SUM(RangeToBeSummed) produces a numeric result. If so, then better to use commas. If not, then it begs the question whether simple SUM formulas should always be changed to =SUMPRODUCT(--RangeToBeSummed) to catch errors all the time. Consistency is a virtue. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
change "true" and "false" to "availble" and "out of stock" | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Combining formulas, "and" & "or" to verify content of multiple cel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
"Control" plus "click" doesn't allow me to select multiple cells | New Users to Excel | |||
Count occurences of "1"/"0" (or"TRUE"/"FALSE") in a row w. conditions in the next | New Users to Excel | |||
freeze window creates multiple "views" suffixed with ":n" | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |