Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently had Excel 2003 SP2 loaded onto my PC. When I tried to use LINEST
function, it did not behave correctly. For a simple linear equation, y = mx + b, when I filled in "=LINEST(Y-Data, X-Data, True, True)", with X-Data and Y-Data the ranges containing the single columns of data as appropriate, the function results were correct. However, when I tried to use it to evaluate parametric data for two or more X-variables, such as y=ax1 + bx2 + cx3, it only returns the coefficient for the x3 variable, showing a=0 and b=0. Is there a bug in the LINEST function in Excel 2003? If not, and there is just something to do with the Excel load on my PC, is there a way to correct it without totally reinstalling MS Office? |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't reproduce this. Just a couple of checks - do you have your
X1,X2,X3 in contiguous columns (e.g., =LINEST(D1:D50,A1:C50,TRUE,TRUE))? Are you selecting at least a 4-column by 5 row area to array-enter the formula? In article , Mark Schreiber wrote: Recently had Excel 2003 SP2 loaded onto my PC. When I tried to use LINEST function, it did not behave correctly. For a simple linear equation, y = mx + b, when I filled in "=LINEST(Y-Data, X-Data, True, True)", with X-Data and Y-Data the ranges containing the single columns of data as appropriate, the function results were correct. However, when I tried to use it to evaluate parametric data for two or more X-variables, such as y=ax1 + bx2 + cx3, it only returns the coefficient for the x3 variable, showing a=0 and b=0. Is there a bug in the LINEST function in Excel 2003? If not, and there is just something to do with the Excel load on my PC, is there a way to correct it without totally reinstalling MS Office? |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Must have been some sort of glitch in the way Excel was running on my PC that
week. When I went back to confirm how I had things set up, according to your comments, I found that I had things set up correctly. But this time I could not reproduce the problem. Thanks. "JE McGimpsey" wrote: I can't reproduce this. Just a couple of checks - do you have your X1,X2,X3 in contiguous columns (e.g., =LINEST(D1:D50,A1:C50,TRUE,TRUE))? Are you selecting at least a 4-column by 5 row area to array-enter the formula? In article , Mark Schreiber wrote: Recently had Excel 2003 SP2 loaded onto my PC. When I tried to use LINEST function, it did not behave correctly. For a simple linear equation, y = mx + b, when I filled in "=LINEST(Y-Data, X-Data, True, True)", with X-Data and Y-Data the ranges containing the single columns of data as appropriate, the function results were correct. However, when I tried to use it to evaluate parametric data for two or more X-variables, such as y=ax1 + bx2 + cx3, it only returns the coefficient for the x3 variable, showing a=0 and b=0. Is there a bug in the LINEST function in Excel 2003? If not, and there is just something to do with the Excel load on my PC, is there a way to correct it without totally reinstalling MS Office? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Linest function | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
LINEST() | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
LINEST | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
LinEst with operator | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Linest - Why did they do that? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |