Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I have a large spreadsheet which is to be used to populate a database with catalogue details. I have used conditional formatting to highlight any cells where an inappropriate entry has been made ie length, number/text or blanks (each column has a different set of criteria). However, rather than have to visually check the entire spreadsheet to see if any errors had been highlighted it would be extremely useful if at the top I had a cell which would flag if any of the cells in the spreadsheet had met the set conditions. If the flag indicated that no cells had inappropriate entries all well and good or if it did indicate an error then I could look for the highlighted cell in the data. Thanks |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would have thought that the easiest way might be to include an extra
column to flag an error on a row by combining (with OR) the error conditions for the cells on that row, and then finally combining with OR the cells in that column. If that cell does indicate an error and you want to find the rows with errors in them, you could autofilter on the error column looking for a TRUE value. -- David Biddulph "Constantly Amazed" wrote in message ... Hi I have a large spreadsheet which is to be used to populate a database with catalogue details. I have used conditional formatting to highlight any cells where an inappropriate entry has been made ie length, number/text or blanks (each column has a different set of criteria). However, rather than have to visually check the entire spreadsheet to see if any errors had been highlighted it would be extremely useful if at the top I had a cell which would flag if any of the cells in the spreadsheet had met the set conditions. If the flag indicated that no cells had inappropriate entries all well and good or if it did indicate an error then I could look for the highlighted cell in the data. Thanks |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks David
However, I understand that the OR function is limited to 30 logical arguements but my spreadsheet has 21 columns all of which have at least 2 conditions ie no. of characters and text or number so I don't see that this solution would allow me to cover all the possible errors in a row. G "David Biddulph" wrote: I would have thought that the easiest way might be to include an extra column to flag an error on a row by combining (with OR) the error conditions for the cells on that row, and then finally combining with OR the cells in that column. If that cell does indicate an error and you want to find the rows with errors in them, you could autofilter on the error column looking for a TRUE value. -- David Biddulph "Constantly Amazed" wrote in message ... Hi I have a large spreadsheet which is to be used to populate a database with catalogue details. I have used conditional formatting to highlight any cells where an inappropriate entry has been made ie length, number/text or blanks (each column has a different set of criteria). However, rather than have to visually check the entire spreadsheet to see if any errors had been highlighted it would be extremely useful if at the top I had a cell which would flag if any of the cells in the spreadsheet had met the set conditions. If the flag indicated that no cells had inappropriate entries all well and good or if it did indicate an error then I could look for the highlighted cell in the data. Thanks |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You could always use hidden columns to group a number of conditions
together, and then OR those. -- David Biddulph "Constantly Amazed" wrote in message ... Thanks David However, I understand that the OR function is limited to 30 logical arguements but my spreadsheet has 21 columns all of which have at least 2 conditions ie no. of characters and text or number so I don't see that this solution would allow me to cover all the possible errors in a row. G "David Biddulph" wrote: I would have thought that the easiest way might be to include an extra column to flag an error on a row by combining (with OR) the error conditions for the cells on that row, and then finally combining with OR the cells in that column. If that cell does indicate an error and you want to find the rows with errors in them, you could autofilter on the error column looking for a TRUE value. -- David Biddulph "Constantly Amazed" wrote in message ... Hi I have a large spreadsheet which is to be used to populate a database with catalogue details. I have used conditional formatting to highlight any cells where an inappropriate entry has been made ie length, number/text or blanks (each column has a different set of criteria). However, rather than have to visually check the entire spreadsheet to see if any errors had been highlighted it would be extremely useful if at the top I had a cell which would flag if any of the cells in the spreadsheet had met the set conditions. If the flag indicated that no cells had inappropriate entries all well and good or if it did indicate an error then I could look for the highlighted cell in the data. Thanks |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks David
Sometimes the simple stuff just gets buried. Have a great Christmas. "David Biddulph" wrote: You could always use hidden columns to group a number of conditions together, and then OR those. -- David Biddulph "Constantly Amazed" wrote in message ... Thanks David However, I understand that the OR function is limited to 30 logical arguements but my spreadsheet has 21 columns all of which have at least 2 conditions ie no. of characters and text or number so I don't see that this solution would allow me to cover all the possible errors in a row. G "David Biddulph" wrote: I would have thought that the easiest way might be to include an extra column to flag an error on a row by combining (with OR) the error conditions for the cells on that row, and then finally combining with OR the cells in that column. If that cell does indicate an error and you want to find the rows with errors in them, you could autofilter on the error column looking for a TRUE value. -- David Biddulph "Constantly Amazed" wrote in message ... Hi I have a large spreadsheet which is to be used to populate a database with catalogue details. I have used conditional formatting to highlight any cells where an inappropriate entry has been made ie length, number/text or blanks (each column has a different set of criteria). However, rather than have to visually check the entire spreadsheet to see if any errors had been highlighted it would be extremely useful if at the top I had a cell which would flag if any of the cells in the spreadsheet had met the set conditions. If the flag indicated that no cells had inappropriate entries all well and good or if it did indicate an error then I could look for the highlighted cell in the data. Thanks |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Displaying a number with different decimals depending on a condition | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Need help with a Multiply Dependent One Cell Formula | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Changing of Colour if my condition is "High" | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
If more than condition forumula | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
conditional formatting - multiple condition | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |