Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apologies if this covered - cannot find.
I believe that the row_index_num in HLOOKUP will never adjust as the formula is copied down but users in our Finance dept are all insisting they have been using HLOOKUP for years and the row index has always adjusted as the formula is copied down a column but no longer does and want IT to fix. An example formula is =HLOOKUP($A$1,'Budget for year'!$A$1:$M$399,3,FALSE) Where $A$1 is a value in the first row of the lookup table which finds the month they are interested in. They have cost codes in the first col of the lookuptable which are duplicated down the first col in the sheet they are using the lookup in. What they want and claim has always happened in the past is for the row index to adjust as the formula is copied down, the example row index changing to 4, 5 , 6 etc so the figure for the correct code is displayed. We can achieve this by using a function to determine the row_index, but they insist they have been using HLOOKUP for years and have never had to do so. Although I think that is not possible, I must be wrong as they are all so adamant. What am I missing? Is there some setting that can be changed to force the rowindexnum to act relatively? Many thanks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
vlookup and hlookup | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Index / Hlookup | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Need help with HLOOKUP and MATCH functions | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
auto adjust columns in a pivot | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
automatically adjust row height in excel 2000 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |