Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 3, 11:53*am, GS wrote:
Matthew, I don't recommend you go there in this case scenario. Doing so will require using object ref syntax, a counter, and typing more code than what you have already. As for your assertion that 'For...Each...Next' is more efficient than 'For...Next', I disagree: the former adds to runtime overhead more than the latter because of the addition 'dot' processing AND required use of a Variant or Object type for the 'Each' object<IMO. -- Garry Free usenet access athttp://www.eternal-september.org ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Thanks for the help Garry. Glad to know i'm not crazy. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
returning back to loop check condition without completing the loop | Excel Programming | |||
Loop to Filter, Name Sheets. If Blank, Exit Loop | Excel Programming | |||
Naming Worksheets - Loop within a loop issue | Excel Programming | |||
(Complex) Loop within loop to create worksheets | Excel Programming | |||
Advancing outer Loop Based on criteria of inner loop | Excel Programming |