Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using the Timer function can present problems every now and then. Here is a
link in which someone pointed out what they thought was a bug in using the Timer function and, if you scroll down, you will see a reply which explains some of the problems in using the Timer function and offers a much more reliable, although not completely perfect (note the 49.7 day roll-over), alternative method. http://us.generation-nt.com/answer/p...11.html?page=2 -- Rick (MVP - Excel) "Mike H" wrote in message ... Hi, You could use the 'timer' function in vb which measures elapsed time and providing you not using a Mac it will return the fractional part of a second. Start = Timer For x = 1 To 10000000: Next elapsedtime = Timer - Start -- Mike When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the question. "zip22" wrote: Excel's Now() function has a resolution down to hh:mm:ss.00 where the VBA Now function only has hh:mm:ss. I need the accuracy of the excel now function in a macro but application.worksheetfunction.now does not work. My workaround at this point is referencing a cell with "=now()" in it, but before I reference it I have to use application.calculate so it updates. Is there a better way to do this? |