Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm thinking about creating a SINGLE accummulative
worksheet for the year 2010 to save our company transactions. Each day, we will fill in 260 cells of data, which means that after 365 days (1 year), our single sheet will contain 94,900 cells filled with data. Does anybody see any problems with storing this much data on a single sheet?? Is it a bad or inefficient idea?? In 2009, we stored our daily transactions in their own separate Excel files, which means that I have 365 individual files at the end of the year, which seems kinda inefficient. Wouldn't having a SINGLE data worksheet be a better (and cooler) idea?? Please let me know what u think. Sincerely, Bob |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
feasibility study | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
loop through a column on a workbook copying data on each row to another workbook, then copy data back to the original workbook | Excel Programming | |||
Running a macro to protect a workbook on a already protected workbook UNprotects the workbook ?? | Excel Programming | |||
feasibility study for small business | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
What commands do you use to name a workbook, save a workbook,open a workbook | Excel Programming |