Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,420
Default VSB more efficient then standard functions?

Rather than use 65536, use a method to determine the last used row, such as

LastRow = Cells(Rows.Count, "A").End(xlUp).Row

and use that to determine the size of the data to be processed.

--
__________________________________
HTH

Bob

"jan" wrote in message
...
hi,

i have linked 1 worksheet to 2 other worksheets (all 3 in the same file)
using VLOOKUP

this in total pulls over 3 different cells into 3 different columns for
all
65536 rows.
a update will take 30 minutes. i assume thsi could be more efficient,
however i don't know how to do that. any suggestions?

thanks.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Efficient IF David Excel Programming 1 September 28th 07 12:23 PM
Can I use standard Functions with MS Query? CJ Excel Programming 1 December 17th 06 08:10 PM
Three new functions that should be part of your standard set Darren Oakey Excel Worksheet Functions 4 May 12th 06 11:56 PM
standard functions not renognized itarnak[_8_] Excel Programming 1 October 24th 05 11:44 AM
Want to use standard excel functions in vb Mark Excel Programming 3 May 18th 05 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"