Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I was a beginner, any code that worked was good code, as far as I was
concerned. Today, any code that works is good code, as far as I am concerned. There is always somebody who can make it look better, run faster or some other frill. Unless you are writing code commercially, including the company you work for, frills are just that. When you learn more, get more confidence in your abilities and have a data base of references for code structure, storage space conservation, execution speeds and so on, you might want to be more concerned about applying those things. In the mean time, when it works, rejoice. "greg" wrote: Hello, I was playing around with the offset. Wanted to get users opinions of offset. If I have a named range. and I want to get the row above, below, etc... Do people like using offset? It seems like I can do, Range("myRange").Offset(-1) and it will give me the range = same column and 1 row above. is this bad to do? thanks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Named range is hidden when using OFFSET() | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Find and offset in named Range | Excel Programming | |||
named range row offset | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
how to use offset with non-adjacent named range | Excel Programming | |||
named range / offset | Excel Programming |