Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Williams" <timjwilliams at gmail dot com wrote in message
... Typical expectation seems to be that reducing object "lookups" (ie. fewer 'dots' to get to the particular object) leads to better performance. An example showing the two different methods you're considering would help. Also -very easy to test... My expectation is that Offset would be faster because there would be less object lookups/assignments. Performance difference would depend on the particular algorithms used and coding skills. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OFFSET and external workbook references | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
OFFSET() function with external references | Excel Programming | |||
Incorporating OFFSET into Chart References | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
OFFSET function returning #VALUE when using external references | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Offset References | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |