Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Technically, can anyone explain to me why Cells.Find() is so much faster than a loop?

Can someone please explain to me why it is so much faster to use the
built in application functions, particularly for searching, when
programming an Excel Macro than creating a loop? Thanks for your time.

  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,939
Default Technically, can anyone explain to me why Cells.Find() is so much

Built in functions are compiled executables where as VBA is not. Additionally
VB/VBA is not the most efficient language when executed where are as the
built in functions are probably using C/C++ or something similar.
--
HTH...

Jim Thomlinson


"Will" wrote:

Can someone please explain to me why it is so much faster to use the
built in application functions, particularly for searching, when
programming an Excel Macro than creating a loop? Thanks for your time.


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Technically, can anyone explain to me why Cells.Find() is so much

On Nov 6, 1:39 pm, Jim Thomlinson <James_Thomlin...@owfg-Re-Move-
This-.com wrote:
Built in functions are compiled executables where as VBA is not. Additionally
VB/VBA is not the most efficient language when executed where are as the
built in functions are probably using C/C++ or something similar.
--
HTH...

Jim Thomlinson

"Will" wrote:
Can someone please explain to me why it is so much faster to use the
built in application functions, particularly for searching, when
programming an Excel Macro than creating a loop? Thanks for


I'm not very versed in computer programming, but how are compiled
executables in dealing with system resources? What about a compiled
executable makes it faster other than running through a VBA compiler
like a hand-made macro?

  #4   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35,218
Default Technically, can anyone explain to me why Cells.Find() is so muchfaster than a loop?

Check your other post.

Will wrote:

Can someone please explain to me why it is so much faster to use the
built in application functions, particularly for searching, when
programming an Excel Macro than creating a loop? Thanks for your time.


--

Dave Peterson
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Next loop faster with counter after Next? RB Smissaert Excel Programming 22 August 28th 06 05:12 AM
Faster way to loop through two ranges YH Excel Programming 5 August 26th 06 05:17 PM
Is there a faster loop than this Andibevan Excel Programming 4 August 25th 06 03:27 PM
VBA | Individual Iterations faster than Loop Statement Butaambala Excel Programming 4 July 3rd 05 12:51 PM
Faster For-Next Loop? [email protected] Excel Programming 3 January 7th 05 09:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"