Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
D-C Dave wrote:
<<Pairs: (12,30), (12,45), (20,30) Pairs 1 and 2 are "related" because they both have 12. Pair 3 is not "related" to either 1 or 2. Bill Renaud" wrote: Pair 3 WOULD be related to pair 1 because 30 is common to both, therefore, Good grief. How could I let that by me? I suppose in some forms of Social Network Analysis (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network et.al.), linkages do not operate the same way that electrical connections do. Well, I want to spend some time on that. Tnx, D-C Dave ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
work with conventional dates for axis scale | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Using some variation of int or trunc | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Variation from the mean? | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
what is an Excel conventional worksheet? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
variation on countif? | Excel Worksheet Functions |