Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oops. I did misunderstand.
But glad you have a solution that works. Jerry W. Lewis wrote: Sorry if I was not clear; I agreed that IsEmpty() did not do what I wanted while "Is Nothing" did; therefore "Is Nothing" is the approach I will be using. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. Jerry "Dave Peterson" wrote: I don't think you missed any easy way of doing this, but I don't think you should be using isempty() to check what may be a multi-cell range. Checking isempty() with a single cell is ok. But that actually tells you if the cell is empty--not a problem when you're looking at constants or formulas, but could be a problem with cells with comments. Jerry W. Lewis wrote: The "Is Nothing" test for ranges (also suggested by Barb) nicely avoids the difficulty of distinguishing no cells from empty cells. Thanks. ... -- Dave Peterson |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
union of named ranges based only on the names of those ranges | Excel Programming | |||
printing Union of Ranges | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Union of Ranges Failed | Excel Programming | |||
union method for non-adjacent ranges | Excel Programming | |||
VBA union of two ranges | Excel Programming |