Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the info. I knew there was a BIG problem but you have to
look for it on the internet. I know lots of people who've experienced this slowdown firsthand so I'm surprised how little is out there. Conspiracy? :o) As an experiment I ran a spreadsheet macro in '03 and '07. 2003 ran the macro in 18 sec, 2007 (w/ 4 x 3.2GHz processors) ran it in 2:33. When I manually set the # of processors to just 1 it actually sped up the run time by 4 sec. I hope MS doesn't try to fool people into thinking this is a hardware issue. My workstation is very fast, with all the latest updates, 4 GB RAM, no junk programs running in the background. I run my box as lean and mean as I can. That's why I had to "upgrade" back to Office XP today. Couldn't handle it anymore. *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's now January 2008, and I notice this thread goes back to mid-2007, without any (apparent) fix by MS. Someone indicated earlier that very few people use large numbers of rows or columns -- I definitely do, and that's why I "graduated" to Office 2007. I thought that the interface between Access and Excel would be much cleaner when both could handle the 1/2 Million or so rows I generally have in my files. Excel is incredibly slow even in the simplest activities (I just waited 20 minutes to clear a couple of columns in a 70,000 row spreadsheet). Inserting blank columns takes forever, even when there are no formulas in the spreadsheet (I remove the formulas by paste special/values, just because they slow things down so much). It seems as if the programs (both Access and Excel) are "anticipating" what a user might do, and pre-storing or pre-computing stuff -- otherwise, why would a simple column insertion or deletion take so much time? I didn't know about being able to save the old Office version when I installed, so I either have to wait for a real fix from MS, or get on another computer with Office 2003. Is this what happens when you have a total monopoly in this product area? *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I followed some of the recommendations described he
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa730921.aspx like making calculations manual and using both ptocessors, but Excel is still painfully slow. SP1 did noy help. My worksheet is only 500 rows by 14 columns. The same worksheet works fast in Excel 2003. *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The solution described here worked!
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/...xcel-2007-calc ulati.aspx *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How can I speed up excel 2007 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Analysis Toolpack Issues in Excel 2007 (Office 2007 Enterprise) | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Speed VBA Excel 2003 vs 2007 | Excel Programming | |||
Speed issues | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Speed Issues again | Excel Programming |