Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have a multi sheet workbook of circa 37 Mb which we've been using
succesfully for a couple of years or so. The main sheet in the WB covers almost all the 256 columns and about 1800 rows, with a mixture of formulae and hard coded values. Recently, and because we needed to extend the data to cover more business periods, and not having sufficient room on the main sheet, I decided to rethink the organisation of the data. Many of the columns were intermediate working columns supporting their particular period's summary values, so I decided to write a UDF to eliminate the working columns and freeing up room for more periods. I now find the workbook is around 47 Mb, which is not a particular problem, but I'd like to know why. Is it normal for columns of UDFs to take more room than columns of standard Excel functions (like If(etc..etc)? It also takes slightly longer to calculate, but I sort of expected that since presumably there is an overhead when the UDF calls the VBE. Can anyone offer a comment on why the Wb takes up about 30% more space? Rgds __ Richard Buttrey Grappenhall, Cheshire, UK __________________________ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
File Size With Macros Has Increased From Its Origina Size | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
What increased my file size from 2mb to 5mb in a week? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
File size increased 7-fold! | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Can actual size of CHECK BOX be increased? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Excel file size increased | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |