Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On page 44 of the excellent Bullen/Bovey/Green book, "Professional
Excel Development," it states: "Within the user-interface tier of many Excel applications lie two unique subtiers. These consist of the workbook and sheet elements used to construct the user-interface and the code supporting those elements. The concept of separation should be rigorously applied to these subtiers. A workbook-based interface should contain no code, and the UI code that controls a workbook-based interface should reside in an add-in completely separated from the workbook it controls." In my application I have the following. User-interface: a userform and a worksheet Business logic: standard code modules Data storage: a worksheet There are certain ranges on the worksheet that forms part of the user interface. If I put Get and Let properties in the code module behind this worksheet that allow for data storage and retrieval, I can access the ranges' data from my standard code modules (business logic). That would eliminate i) declaring global range objects to be used among the various code modules, or ii) passing range objects as arguments among the macros that would use them. However, if I do put properties in the code module for the user interface's worksheet, will I be violating the principles cited above from the book? What is best practice? Will I not be properly isolating the user interface from the business logic? Thanks in advance. Mark |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I am looking for a template for a professional looking price book | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Work schedule development question | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Professional Excel Development | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Professional Data Recovery Software Development Help | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Form development question | Excel Programming |