Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay - Now I'm with you. That's why you commented about future lazy
programmers - they might set a reference to my Public x directly rather than going through my class object (?). If that's the only concern it's not so bad since I will distribute the code as an xla and make that module private so it's only my own laziness that I have to watch out for. Re my obvious confusion over variable scope. My thinking was: Set m_objMyNewRef = GetOpenServer() - GetOpenServer() - Set m_objOpenServer = OpenServerClass object, Set GetOpenServer() = m_objOpenServer So now there is a pointer from m_objMyNewRef to m_objOpenServer and from m_objOpenServer to the actual OpenServer class Now when I do, Set m_objOpenServer = Nothing, m_objMyNewRef is still pointing to m_objOpenServer (or so I thought) so m_objOpenServer wouldn't be destroyed. It seems the reference though is direcly from m_objMyNewRef to the OpenServer class. As I write this I've remembered something along these lines in the vba developers handbook - will have to read again tonight. Caught out by my own wishful thinking... Once again thanks - I will go with your proposed solution. Best Regards, Andrew |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Single Excel instance with multiple windows | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
run a single instance of excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Userform level class instance doesn't recognize methods | Excel Programming | |||
Class Instance Identifier | Excel Programming | |||
Excel Single Instance | Excel Programming |