Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have several workbooks that I have linked together into one. I would
like to be able to show them in the destination workbook in a long list, without space left in between each subset of data. The issue is, when I add a new row in the source workbook, it does not get picked up in the destination workbook. OR, if I select beyond the actual data subset in the source (blank rows) to allow for the possibility of additional rows being added, then these rows get all filled with zeros when copied into the destination - a result I cannot allow since zero is a valid value in some columns and this skews the data analysis being done. Is there a way to get the additional new columns into the destination workbook without having to initially set it up with blank rows? Suggestions? Thanks! Cat |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cat,
No need to post multiple times - either cross post (one post to multiple groups, all at once) or just post to the most likely-looking group. Most of the big-guns follow most of the popular groups anyway. Here's my previous answer: 1) Use a macro, one that combines the data sets just prior to processing the data. Usually, very efficient. 2) (this would be my preference) - Don't use separate files - use one file, a one-sheet database, with an additional field to indicate which file it would have gone in. Then use data filters to show subsets of the data when you want to see the individual files. HTH, Bernie MS Excel MVP "Cat" wrote in message oups.com... I have several workbooks that I have linked together into one. I would like to be able to show them in the destination workbook in a long list, without space left in between each subset of data. The issue is, when I add a new row in the source workbook, it does not get picked up in the destination workbook. OR, if I select beyond the actual data subset in the source (blank rows) to allow for the possibility of additional rows being added, then these rows get all filled with zeros when copied into the destination - a result I cannot allow since zero is a valid value in some columns and this skews the data analysis being done. Is there a way to get the additional new columns into the destination workbook without having to initially set it up with blank rows? Suggestions? Thanks! Cat |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My issue was not in being able to identify which rows are from what
source book, but specifically allowing the master workbook to get new rows entered in the source. For example, source workbook 1 has the following: ColA ColB ColC XXX BBB 999 Source workbook 2 has following: ColA ColB ColC PPP UUU 111 So the master has this view: ColA ColB ColC XXX BBB 999 PPP UUU 111 When Source Workbook 1 gets a new row, like - ColA ColB ColC YYY NEW 989 I need the master to get that new row, and using Copy, Special Paste, Paste Link, the only way I know to get it is to initially copy more than the row that is populated, and this means having a master workbook with a lot of padded empty rows to allow for the additional rows in the source workbooks. Hopefully this makes it clearer. Thanks! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Protecting linked source data | Links and Linking in Excel | |||
Multiple "source" workbooks linked to single "destination" workboo | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
linking multiple books (source.xls) to a single book (destination. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Updating the source of a linked cell | Links and Linking in Excel | |||
Display 2 formulas from source workbooks to destination workbooks | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |