Your code worked for me as-is.

(just to muddy the waters)

Chip wrote:

Thanks Dave. That worked perfectly for me. I don't know why that
works, but I'll take it. Yea it's odd Tom because it definitely
doesn't work for me as is, but with Dave's code (setting the position a
second time it worked perfectly). Thank you both for the help. This
forum wouldnt be where it is without you both.

--

Dave Peterson