Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
Trace dependents
I have (sigh) inherited an EXCEL file that uses range names extensively, a
practice that, while valuable for some users doing sanity checks, is not that valuable when you are trying to carefully check everything, at least as I see it. I notice a number of curious things. How do I get the equations to show the underlying cells rather than their range names? Does using range names have any effect on trace dependents and trace precedents? For example, when I go to one cell and hit trace precedent, it shows me a precedent. When I select that precedent and go there, then hit trace dependents, it says there are none! I notice that the latter cell has a range name. Would that cause this not to show up? It seems that, for some range names, the same range name is used multiple times, i.e., only once per worksheet, but on multiple sheets. Is it true that EXCEL has no problems with the same name being used multiple times in a file? If so, does the range of cells always need to be in the exact same locations on each sheet? I wanted to have a map of all range names, but when I do the commands: insert, name, paste, paste link, I'm not sure it knows which of the identical range name cells to map to - perhaps it just chooses the one on the nearest worksheet. Does anyone know? Please answer ONLY what you know right away. I don't need every answer right away. Thank you very much, Dean |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
trace all dependents | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Trace Dependents - not working | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
trace dependents | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Trace Dependents | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
trace dependents | Excel Worksheet Functions |