Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tushar Mehta" wrote...
.... You might be surprised but the last time I checked there was no rule that says MS XL MVPs are not allowed to be good with regular expressions. No rule at all. Just reacting to the apparent premise that expertise in one field implies expertise in other, tenuously related fields. Why did you bother with the regexp example page when there are hundreds of thousands of posts on regexps in the archives of comp.unix.shell, comp.lang.perl.misc and comp.lang.awk (as well as alt.editors.batch [sed], comp.editors [vi and EMACS], and the newsgroups for Python, Ruby, PHP and for all I know Rebol, Tcl, and lua). You know, Harlan, in many aspects you are technically good. I just don't understand how you have developed this idea that rudeness is a measure of technical competence. But, I guess, to each his own. Rudeness is one of my flaws. It's unrelated to any technical competence. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Get rid of with regular expressions | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Regular expressions in VB | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Regular Expressions & Middle Name | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Regular expressions in Excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
VBA and Regular expressions | Excel Programming |