Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure Microsoft would prefer the latter if you can still get licenses.
I don't develop in Net, but I believe I read something about the InterOp whatever not being available for older versions of excel (don't recall if it was 2000 and earlier or 2002 or earlier). In any event, you have proved the 2002 will work, so upgrading sounds best. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy "Michael Kellogg" wrote in message 8.16... "Tom Ogilvy" wrote: Develop on the lowest version of excel that will use the app. Excellent advice. I got upgraded to 2003 several months ago because one of our projects needed an app that worked with Word 2003; this because the files being sent to us by our client were in some new Word XML format that no other version could work with. So now here I sit, with versions almost no one else here has. The question is, should I remove my copy of Office and have 2000 re- installed? Or should I get everyone else upgraded at least to 2002, where compatibility will be less of an issue. Personally I'd prefer the latter for a number of reasons. I appreciate the feedback. -- Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to you open multiple versions of Excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Multiple Excel versions. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
VB6 COM Add-In for multiple Excel and Word versions | Excel Programming | |||
VB6 COM Add-In for multiple Excel and Word versions | Excel Programming | |||
updating Excel from DotNet | Excel Programming |