Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you got way too much free time :)
Interesting to know though, every second counts... Paul D "shieb" wrote in message ... I know you already have a solution, but I was bored and curious. It appears using an array is about 70% faster than the Range.Replace method. Here's an example using 1 sheet, a named range, 25k rows x 10 columns: Sub ArrayTest() Dim A As Variant Dim R As Long Dim C As Long A = Sheet1.Range("DataSet").Value For R = 1 To 25000 For C = 1 To 10 If A(R, C) = " " Then A(R, C) = "" Next C Next R Sheet1.Range("DataSet").Value = A Set A = Nothing End Sub This took 1.109 seconds compared to 4.110 using a .Replace method. FYI, my guess is you have worksheet level events causing the slow down in your orginal code. So, the Application.EnableEvents = False in prior posts probably helped a lot. Regards, Steve Hieb -- shieb ------------------------------------------------------------------------ shieb's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php...o&userid=16404 View this thread: http://www.excelforum.com/showthread...hreadid=277560 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Macro: Find and replace | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
find&replace macro | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Optimizing a macro for speed- find and replace | Excel Programming | |||
optimizing a macro | Excel Programming | |||
Using Find & Replace in macro | Excel Programming |