Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have written some code to find out average of some
numbers. Although if i used Excel's existing formula, average, to work it out, the result would be different (about less than 1% for an average of 720 numbers) from that derived using my own code. I wonder if the difference is due to rounding errors. Is it possible to take a look at the code behind Excel's existing formulas? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A formula to AVERAGE IF but only average a set number of values | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Find monthly average but have average automatically configured | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Error Handling #N/A with AVERAGE Function - Average of values in Row | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Weighed Average of a weiged average when there are blanks | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
how does one convert text to a formula "average(A:A)" to =average( | Excel Worksheet Functions |