Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have an app that runs several queries depending on user input. The data
source is an Access database that's right at the 2GB limit. I stored numerous queries in the database to cover all the possible user selections from the Excel app. I'd read that stored queries are a bit faster than just sending the SQL script. Database resides on a LAN Average time on these varies from 2 1/2 mins to 5 mins. From listening to users (especially my boss) we need to improve this time. I've tried every way I could think of to run this and nothing shortens the time. 99.5% of the wait is while opening the recordsets. My question: Due to the size of this db (and its only one table but with 1.5M records) would moving this to a SQL table and querying off of that speed this up? I do some other stuff against our main SQL tables and they are painfully slow, but that's with lots of joins and far more records. This would just be the one table. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Performance Issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel Performance issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel Viewer performance issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
how do i set up employee performance database in excel | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Iteration performance issue | Excel Programming |