Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He could program around them, by isolating the 2002 code in modules that do
not get called when the code is run in Excel 2000, but that can be tricky and does depend on how the code is structured. This would eliminate the run-time errors, but the compile errors would still occur. Cleanest way is to develop in Excel 2000. -- http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site. "Tom Ogilvy" wrote in message ... there is no difference in formats since xl97. Getting the compile errors is what he is getting now. He wants some automatic way to fix them - I don't believe there is a way to do that. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "tom" wrote in message ... is there another way then creating the macro in the older excel version? this takes tooo long (e.g. siable the feature in excel 2000? Just do a save as into Excel 2000 format and open Excel 2000 , you should get the errors when you compile It that doesnt work export the code modules from 2002 and load em into 2000 Keith |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Saving a newer version of Excel using an older version (Excel 97) | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Downloading newer files to older excel versions. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel 2000 patch to view newer Excel versions (2003 and 2007) | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Anyone have troubles running 2003 macros in 2000 version of Excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Do any newer versions of Excel (2003 or XP) offer more than 65,53. | Excel Worksheet Functions |