Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello.
I have a spreadsheet divided into two sections. I've used the first seven lines to summarise the data contained in the rest of the sheet. The eight row is used to define the column data labels, and the actual data is contained in rows nine onwards. The strange behaviour I've noticed is that when I sort on any of the first three column data label on the data label row, the first three columns are correctly sorted, but the other columns are left unchanged! The same applies for the other columns: sorting on any of these has no effect on the first three columns. It's almost as if the bottom half of the spreadsheet has been split into two separate halves. This has the side effect that the data summarised in the top section depends on how I've sorted the rows below! I've tried using Data-Sort, but this hasn't helped. As a final experiment, I removed the top section, so that the first row is now the data header row. Made no difference. I'm sure that I'm doing something stupid. I've used this before, and it worked, but this spreadsheet is based on a file I received from a colleague. Could there be special formatting embedded in the file? Can anyone help me? Many thanks, Paul |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sorting data rows independently | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Strange "FormatCells" behaviour | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Insert rows | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Strange behaviour | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Adding Rows to Master Sheet | New Users to Excel |