Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Can anyone (briefly) compare and contrast these two Excel features? We have a set of data from a study for which we are trying to plot a decay curve with an accompanying half-life calculation. One option is to create a plot of the data with an exponential trendline (Y=b*exp^cx). Another is to use the Solve add-in, utilizing the same equation, and minimize the sum of the squared deviations by manipulating the regression coefficients (b and c). Both methods seem to yield a curve that gives a reasonable approximation of the observed data, but with slightly different rate coefficients, which will of course yield slightly different half-lives. Any thoughts on which approach is more appropriate? Thanks. -- jcoleman52 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jcoleman52's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php...o&userid=29498 View this thread: http://www.excelforum.com/showthread...hreadid=495288 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Trouble with Solver | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Using Solver with VBA | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Trendline Extract | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Excel option to store trendline's coefficients in cells for use | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
How do I get the trendline equation from Excel to script? | Charts and Charting in Excel |