Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Post your formula... there is no constraint on index match. That being said
index match is about 5% slower than VLookup... http://www.decisionmodels.com/optspeede.htm That being said index match is IMO the way to go for many reasons most noteably it is far less prone to error than VLookup. My best guess at your problem would have to with absolute vs relative references. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Ken" wrote: Excel2003 ... My understanding is ... an array "Index/Match" Formula calculates faster than a "VLookup" Formula ... If so, then I would like to use "Index/Match". Also, I often do use "Index/Match" as the Index can be either R or L of target cell. Issue ... with 2 Cols of 40,000 records ... Index/Match Formula fails to copy all the way down the 2nd Col ... It seems to fail @ about 20,000 records down the 2nd Col (one clarifier ... I am on the same WorkSheet ... adjacent Cols) Above said ... Am I up against an "Index/Match" constraint here ... or ... as is generally the case ... Is this an oversight on my part? Please enlighten me ... Thanks for the guidance ... Kha |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vlookup or Index/Match | New Users to Excel | |||
VLOOKUP vs INDEX and MATCH | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
index Match, or Vlookup Match.. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Need Help with Index and Match or Vlookup | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Index Match Vlookup or something else | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |