Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, I'm having a problem with a complex validation, where the combined length
of the formulas got longer than 256 character, which seems to be the limit on the Custom formula field under Validation in Excel 2003 (also when doing conditional formatting?). For various reasons (mostly related to users), I can't use the obvious workrounds with a separate cell with the validation test, and I can't put any macros into the spreadsheet. So I thought, why not use Named formulas? Alas, this doesn't seem to work, or at least not the way I expect. Small example: define the name Test and make it refer to "=$A$11". set custom validation on cell $A$1 to "=Test". Now I expect a warning on the value '0' in cell $A$1, but actually anything goes. Am I missing something? Is there any other way around the size limit on validation formulas, that does not involve macros or extra cells/sheets? Cheers /naffats |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Validation; add items to named range | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Data Validation and named lists | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Named Range name problem in validation | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Validation protection with named ranges | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Excel2K: Is it possible to use dynamic named ranges in custom data validation formula? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |