Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I'm glad my part of it ended up working. Remember that all LOOKUP
variants; LOOKUP, VLOOKUP and HLOOKUP always stop looking at the first match they make, so they can't see multiple possible matches in a list. Also, unless you specify the 4th parameter in VLOOKUP() and HLOOKUP() as ,FALSE) then the lists have to be in sequence. "David" wrote: JLatham: Thanks for helping me out. I realied I made a mistake in mod your UDF. I also found the issue I have was due to excel itself. I found in some instances, excel did logical comparison wrong. In one instance, the output from lookup function was 20 and the other one was 450. In my IF statement, I wrote if cell with 20 was greater than cell with 450. I got the wrong answer. I plugged in number instead and it worked just fine. I think MS needs to redefine the lookup function. Now, I use a several lookup to get a several results and then I place them as value and use IF to redefine the result. It is a long way but somehow it works almost 90% of the times. Thanks for your help. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Substitute | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
=SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE.... max. limit 8 :( | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
More than 7 IF? any substitute? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
SUBSTITUTE | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
substitute for = | Excel Worksheet Functions |