LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default harder than i thought

=IF(U30,U1,"")

what i really want is for this to look in u4 and then u5 and so on until it
finds a 1 or a (1) and if it finds the negative (1) turn the reported number
red.

then in the next adjacent cell in the the formula to look for the next cell
that contains a number so if the first one found a number in u4 then i would
need this one to ignor that and look at u5 and so on.

i tried to use LARGE which i think is right but i'm doing something wrong. i
only need to find the first 6 columns that have a 1 in them because there
would never be more than 6 columns that contain a 1.

i will be searching about 40 columns.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Autofilter so different, harder to use drugrep Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 12 November 2nd 07 07:00 PM
Don't think it's possible, but I thought I would ask. smaumau Excel Worksheet Functions 1 April 3rd 06 11:20 PM
This is A LOT harder than I thought it would be Robert Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 13 August 24th 05 12:20 AM
Things are getting a little harder! S.H.C New Users to Excel 3 April 13th 05 11:08 PM
On second thought ... Jerry Kinder New Users to Excel 0 November 26th 04 02:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"