Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I am designing a workbook that generates sheets from a macro. These sheets are all copies of a template sheet, in which there is another button attached to a macro. Consequently, all subsequently generated sheets contain this button and the associated macro. This situation works fine in theory, but practically, I'm running into a "Not enough resources to display completely" message, which doesn't seem to do anything other than annoy me, and calculation times are outrageous, 2-3 seconds each time I enter a value into a cell, string or not, precedent or not. It seems like excel is doing a full recalc every time I change a cell. My main problem is that system resources business, and that is the point of my question: Will setting up the macro as a public subprocedure in a module, while simply calling it from the embedded sheet buttons, free up any memory compared to the way I'm already doing it? Thanks in advance, Ed xl2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Macros crash, "Not enough memory" | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
XL 2007 memory usage | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Monitor memory usage | Links and Linking in Excel | |||
Monitor memory usage | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Expanding memory usage Excel 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |