Selecting Rows by Column Value
Huh!!??
--
Regards,
Tom Ogilvy
Alan Beban wrote in message
...
*I* didn't sort descending; it just seems to me that it's the obvious
way the OP would have VALUE1 in 1200 to 3500 like he said. As far as
spell binding [sic] contributions go, *you're* the one who contributed
the gratuitous (and puzzling) notion that you couldn't see how the OP
could have the situation he said he has.
Alan Beban
Tom Ogilvy wrote:
Why would you sort descending? I am sure you can fantasize any number
of
colorful scenarios. Your spell binding contributions continue to
scintillate
the assembled masses. <g
--
Regards,
Tom Ogilvy
Alan Beban wrote in message
...
Huh??? With 1199 VALUE2's and 2301 VALUE1's in D1:D3500, sorted in
descending order. Did I miss something in your question?
Alan Beban
Tom Ogilvy wrote:
If you only have two values and they are grouped together/sorted, how
could
the area be 1200 to 3500
in any event, if that is the case, the you could use Find to find the
first
Value1 as well.
|