View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
RagDyer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I know *exactly* what I'm going to do as far as the procedures are
concerned, and everything is conceptually consistent with historical company
performance.

So ... as I read it here, and as I remind myself what I've read in those
past threads, I should have *no* problem by switching to a strictly "day"
computation policy.

Appreciate the comments.

Regards,

RD

"RagDyeR" wrote in message
...
About to start out on a seniority project for the plants.

If this was 3 months ago, I wouldn't have given a second thought about

using
Datedif.

However, in the past couple of weeks, I've read, and been part of threads
where the inconsistencies of the function have been brought to light.

Of course, seniority will range over the full gamut of time, from days to
years.

Would you please just share with me your opinion on the function?

Would YOU use it ... or not?


TIA,

RD