John C <johnc@stateofdenial wrote...
I have read many of your posts, and you are constantly condescending. . . .

Biff (T. Valko) can defend himself. Besides, I didn't think I was
being condescending to him. I may have been pedantic and
overengineering, but not condescending. I wasn't responding to the OP.

As for you, you want to correct me. From your perspective, I'm
incorrigible. Are you too stupid to realize this?

. . . but get down off your high horse and treat other with respect. . . .

I do treat people with respect by default. Also definitely when they
deserve it. However, people like you who regret having grown too old
to be hall monitors and now look for other ways to make other people
do what you want them to do get what you get, at least not in the
threads where you're acting foolish.

Finally, without the condescension, to repeat:

Robustness is good. The formula

=SUMPRODUCT(--(MOD(A1:A10,2)0))

is OBJECTIVELY LESS ROBUST than

=SUMPRODUCT(--(MOD(A1:A10,2)=1))


Robustness isn't worthwhile?

The last formula will ALWAYS return the count of odd integers in
A1:A10 even when that range contains nonintegers and nonnumbers. Only
when there are error values in A1:A10 (or values greater than 2^28-1)
would it return something else (error values). Wouldn't that make it
more generally applicable and less subject to bugs in subsequent use?