sumif maybe? [OT]
But what about the thought that if you read the 'whole' of the posts
to see what has been happening - so to speak - its natural to read the
original post first, at the top, and then following posts after that.
But it doesnt matter, whatever you guys think is best I will do. I DO
still need a solution for my original question and I think this thread
is getting way off topic.
Esra
On Aug 30, 12:21*am, "Don Guillett" wrote:
If you think about it, it is NOT natural to have to page down to the bottom
to read a post. With top posting it's right in front of you. Most here
agree. Some don't....
--
Don Guillett
Microsoft MVP Excel
SalesAid Software
"smartin" wrote in message
...
Don Guillett wrote:
[much snipped]
Also, please top post.
[OT]
I usually refrain from participating in top- vs bottom-posting debacles,
but I do not recall any mention of a "top posting rule" here. Or is that
your personal preference?
Both methods have merit. IME, in technical discussions the latter is
preferred and more natural.
YMMV.- Hide quoted
|