View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.charting
Jon Peltier Jon Peltier is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,582
Default Re-imagining charting software (was Axis with 2 labels)

(and therein lies an interesting bug/feature/property that's the key to a
favourite trick of mine for quick and dirty step charts)


Ooh, tell us more!

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com
_______


"Del Cotter" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 2 May 2007, in microsoft.public.excel.charting,
Kelly O'Day said:
If I were redoing Excel's charting tool, I'd drop the XY (Scatter) Chart -
Line Chart terminology. To me, all 2 D charts are XY charts; scatter and
line charts are just special forms of XY charts. How many questions show
up
on the Chart forum because users want to have a "line" chart with numeric
values for X and Y.


Yes, there is an important difference between the Scatter chart and the
Line chart, but it's a difference whose value should not be held in the
"Chart type" field, but in the "Axis type" field. The Format Axis dialogue
box should offer the types "Nominal", "Ordinal", and "Interval" as named
by S. S. Stevens in the 1940s.

"Nominal" is like Excel's "Category"

"Ordinal" is like Excel's "Time-scale" (and therein lies an interesting
bug/feature/property that's the key to a favourite trick of mine for quick
and dirty step charts)

"Interval" is the scale type Excel calls "Category" when the chart type is
Scatter. But the chart type is an inappropriate way of controlling the
difference, a bad early design choice by Microsoft that's now frozen in.

--
Del Cotter
NB Personal replies to this post will send email to
,
which goes to a spam folder-- please send your email to del3 instead.