I would like to experiment with this. Can you send me a file with data (no
chart) and tell me what activity makes a dual cpu system crawl.
Thanks
--
Bernard V Liengme
www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme
remove caps from email

"JLatham" <HelpFrom @ Jlathamsite.com.(removethis) wrote in message
...
Since the other features have been addressed, I guess I'll tackle this
one:

"Why is it when I work with scatter plots in Excel 2007 my dual Xeon CPU
computer with 4 GB RAM slows to a crawl? Is this a feature? It's never
done
that with Excel XP, Excel 2003, or any other application."

I figure it must be a feature - does same on both my AMD X2 4800+
dual-core
2GB system and on my Intel E6600 Core-Duo 2GB systems. Doing one set of
x-y
scattercharts on either of those two machines takes 11 to 12 minutes to
complete, and once complete, then system performance while in Excel is on
par
with a laptop with a dead battery. Same work on a single-core AMD 3200+
system with 1 GB of RAM and Excel 2003 takes about 1minute 40 seconds.

"Paul Z." wrote:

I am a fairly experience Excel XP and 2003 user and I have a few
questions:

Why is it when I work with scatter plots in Excel 2007 my dual Xeon CPU
computer with 4 GB RAM slows to a crawl? Is this a feature? It's never
done
that with Excel XP, Excel 2003, or any other application.

How does one add chart and axis labels to a scatter plot? Not that I
need
them, all my end users prefer scatter plots with no axis labels. That
way
the charts can be interpreted any way they please. Yet another feature?

Given a scatter plot with a singe series of 4 data points, how does one
add
a 2nd degree polynomial trend line to the data? And why is it when I try
to
do that and display the polynomial equation on the chart a linear
equation is
displayed? Is Excel 2007 dropping the 2nd degree factor from the trend
line
label or is Excel 2007 refusing to do a quadratic fit because it thinks I
do
not have enough data points? Another feature, right?