y=a-b*exp(-c*x^d).
I have the x and y values
However, when I use solver, the values are not
dependable because solver needs initial parameters.
Hi. If interested, I got Solver to work with about 30 test points.
I don't have your data, but just note that x must be =0.
For example, with your x^d, if we had a neg x, and d was 3.4:
=POWER(-1.2, 3.4)
then Excel returns #Num! error, as it can't return the Complex number.
On my test data, a,b,c,& d were given small positive values (~1-3)
In general, Solver can not do Least Square fitting.
The nature of your equation may allow the following technique.
Have your column of x & y values (name y values "y")
Have 4 changing cells names a,b,c_, d. (Note name "c" must be "c_" in
Excel)
Initially put something like 1 in each cell.
Next to y, put your equation based on the changing cells. (name it something
like fx)
=a-b*EXP(-c_*x^d)
Next column is the error =y-fx .
Target cell is the Sum of the errors.
Minimize Target
Changing cells: a,b,c_,d
st:
Target =0
fx<y
Check Option "Assume non-Negative"
Again, this should work, but may not work with your particular values of
a,b,c_ & d.
I would be interested if you emailed me your values.
Thanks.
Dana
--
HTH :)
Dana DeLouis
Windows XP & Office 2003
"
m wrote in message
...
Thanks for your help. I'm starting to think that this might not be
possible
without using solver. However, when I use solver, the values are not
dependable because solver needs initial parameters. If anyone else has
any
ideas please let me know.
Thanks!
"Jon Peltier" wrote:
Linest has no facility for estimating so many convoluted parameters. If
you
transform your data, you can use LINEST to compute Weibull parameters:
http://www.qualitydigest.com/jan99/html/weibull.html
http://www.duxbury.com/authors/varde...bull_plot.html
- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com
_______
"
m wrote in message
...
I treid using the solver approach and could not get the correct values.
There is no way to manipulate the equation using the linest function?
"Jon Peltier" wrote:
I would think very hard about it, then try to design a Solver
approach.
The
idea is to minimize error of the predicted relationship: vary the four
parameters a-d while minimizing the difference between x-yActual pairs
and
x-yPredicted pairs.
- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com
_______
"
m wrote in message
...
I need to find four coeffecients for the equation y=a-b*exp(-c*x^d).
I
have
the x and y values but want to smooth the data. I've been trying to
fit a
non-linear trend to the equation using the power and log trends but
since
my
equation differs I cannot get them to work. Do you know any way to
find
these coefficients?