{=SUM()} vs =SUMPRODUCT()
The advantage of SUMPRODUCT is that it doesn't have to be array entered.
--
HTH
Bob Phillips
(replace xxxx in the email address with gmail if mailing direct)
"MDW" wrote in message
...
I've inhereted a workbook where the previous owner used a complex {=SUM()}
function to approximate a SUMPRODUCT(). It currently is working fine, but
I
wonder if there are any advantages to changing the functions to be actual
SUMPRODUCT. Does using SUM in this way take up more resources/become
unstable, etc?
I'm chasing down some gremlins in my Excel workbooks and this one popped
out
at me.
For reference, the current function looks something like this:
{=SUM(($A4='C:\[external-file.xls]sheet1'!$A$9:$A$15000)*(AX$1='C:\[external
-file.xls]sheet1'!$C$9:$C$15000)*'C:\[external-file.xls]sheet1'!$F$9:$F$1500
0))}
--
Hmm...they have the Internet on COMPUTERS now!
|