I don't understand, what difference does it make? As long as a False
condition evaluates to False, isn't that OK? It would make a difference with
OR, but not AND.

--
HTH

Bob Phillips

(remove xxx from email address if mailing direct)

"Mike McLellan" wrote in message
...
Does the AND function always evaluate all arguments or only until it comes
across the first one that evaluates as FALSE? If the former is the case,
is
there any way to make it work the second way without using a n ested IF
statement?