The data is in weeks as in week numbers, or weeks as in dates seven days
apart? If you don't have real dates, the date axis will do you little good.

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services - Tutorials and Custom Solutions -
http://PeltierTech.com/
2006 Excel User Conference, 19-21 April, Atlantic City, NJ
http://peltiertech.com/Excel/ExcelUserConf06.html
_______

"bj.williams" wrote in message
...
The chart is a line chart. The data is in weeks. That's the lowest range
I
can go. The time scale option then creates an odd looking chart without
the
data point for each week showing.

"Jon Peltier" wrote:

Make a line chart rather than an XY chart. Use real dates
(month-day-year),
not just month numbers. Make sure Excel draws a date scale: Chart menu
Chart Options Axes tab, select Time Scale instead of Category. Double
click the axis, set Base Unit on the Scale tab to Days and use months or
years for the other (or 7 days) for major unit.

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services - Tutorials and Custom Solutions -
http://PeltierTech.com/
2006 Excel User Conference, 19-21 April, Atlantic City, NJ
http://peltiertech.com/Excel/ExcelUserConf06.html
_______

"bj.williams" wrote in message
...
Excel 2003. On a chart with weekly data point values and a total range
from
2000 through year to date 2006, the fact that 2004 had 53 weeks rather
than
52 skews the yearly increments on the x-axis (bottom scale) on the
chart.
It
shows 2004 correctly, but shows 2004 again for the actual 2005 tick
mark
and
2005 for 2006. I've tried setting the number of catagories between the
tick
marks at 53 (instead of 52), but it throws off the alignment of the
year
label to the tick mark and it gets incrementally worse every year.
Need a
way of making the scale on the x-axis ignore that 2004 had 53 weeks and
show
accurate years at each tick mark.