On 6/18/12 9:16 PM, in article
, "Onion
Knight" wrote:

The tantrum is allSnit's... here is what he was originally arguing
before he realized his stepped on his d*ck:

https://groups.google.com/group/comp...msg/edd65e9dce...

Funny how you keep trolling Snit but can't show where he was wrong in
any place he did not point out.

I have repeatedly proved Carroll and his sock cc wrong:

1) cc was wrong to say I missed steps in the creation of a linear trend line
in Excel. I did no such thing.

2) cc was wrong to claim the incorrect depictions I showed him of sigma
lines were, in fact, incorrect. But they were.

3) cc was wrong to say I was pushing the correlations I noted as being proof
of the causation I had spoken of earlier. I did no such thing.

4) cc was wrong to deny the fact that on a depiction of a normal
distribution you can visually see where the sigma lines should be drawn
based on the distance from the mean (specifically, the distance from the
mean to the inflection points).

5) cc was wrong to deny I showed an upward trend in Linux usage, based on
the data we were both using. The upward trend was in the latter half of
2011: <http://goo.gl/NhFuK.

There is no reasoned debate about any of these facts... but Carroll and cc
cannot just let it go and will never admit to their errors.


--
The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P
cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP
7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu
cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.