View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
Peter T Peter T is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,600
Default Nothing Keyword Destories Objects rather than just resetting the variable to an empty variable

Afraid I don't follow most of that, maybe a simple example might help.

One thing though, I think you are misunderstanding the difference of passing
an object byref & byval. Either way, any changes to the object's properties
will persist.

The only difference is with byval a new pointer to the original object is
created and passed. This means even if you destroy or reassign the byval
object within the procedure, the original object variable will continue
point to the same object.

Regards,
Peter T



"Ronald R. Dodge, Jr." wrote in message
...
Office XP, SP3 (VBA 6.0)
WIN XP, SP2


I have read over the text dealing with custom objects

According to the text that I have read online from MS themselves, the
keyword "NOTHING" should only destroy the object when there is no other
variable refering to that object. However, as I have learned the hard
way, that is not the case. Any time any variable is set to NOTHING, the
object is destroyed, so any object variable referencing to that object is
then also set to NOTHING.

Example:

PayCode collection has a set of objects containing properties. One of
those PayCode objects is passed onto an Employee Object. It's passed into
the employee object via a property with the object using the ByRef within
the signature line, so if there's any changes to the PayCode object, it's
not only changed within the PayCodes collection, but also within the
Employee's PayCode reference to it.

However, if the Employee Object is set to be destroyed, via the clean up
code, the code should be to set the object variable within the Employee
Object to NOTHING. However, doing that not only does that, but also set's
that particular object within the PayCodes collection to NOTHING as if the
object itself has been destroyed.

How do I resolve this issue, so as I can have it reset only the variable,
not destroy the actual object, but yet, also allow for changes to carry
into the variable when they are done into the main object?

--
Thanks,

Ronald R. Dodge, Jr.
Production Statistician
Master MOUS 2000