View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
Dave Peterson Dave Peterson is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35,218
Default findnext question

Worse than not needed. It causes a run time error for me.

But that example was changed from an earlier version. In an earlier version, it
changed colors--not values. When they changed the example, they broke it.

Gary Keramidas wrote:

ok, thanks to both for the explanation. so, in the help example for findnext, is
"Loop While Not c Is Nothing And c.Address < firstAddress"
needed? it's changing 2 to 5, so i would think that line isn't needed, either.

--

Gary

"Dave Peterson" wrote in message
...
This line from VBAs help:

Loop While Not c Is Nothing And c.Address < firstAddress

will blow up if c is nothing (since c.address will return an error).

If you weren't removing the seached value, then the .findnext() would loop
until
it got to the first found cell and never be nothing.

Gary Keramidas wrote:

in the help, they use firstaddress = c.address so the code doesn't loop
continuously

if i use similar, it generates an error, but my code seems to run fine,
what's
the difference?

With ws.Range("C1:C" & lastRow)
Set rngFound = .Find(What:="<", LookIn:=xlValues)
Do
If Not rngFound Is Nothing Then
rngFound.Value = Replace(Replace(rngFound.Value, "<", "-", 1),
"",
_
"")
rngFound.NumberFormat = "#,##0_);[Red](#,##0.00)"
Set rngFound = .FindNext(rngFound)
End If
Loop While Not rngFound Is Nothing
End With

--

Gary


--

Dave Peterson


--

Dave Peterson