View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
Jos Vens[_2_] Jos Vens[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default XLA versus Reference versus Nothing

Hi,

in short, I repeat my question which did not appear in the newsgroup this
afternoon (server problems???).

I made an application in VBA Excel. I split up my workbooks and program-code
so I could easily make an update.

1° First (2000-2003), I worked with a reference to the excel file that had
the code
2° Later (2003-now), I worked with an XLA addin which was automatically
loaded on startup (in Addin-list of Excel)
3° Now (today), I discoverd that simply opening the XLA-file is enough to
make it work, so it must not be in the addin-list (addin installed), and
even more, it must not be a proper Excel file (extension is not important).

Why do I find the third method the best? Well, I the past, I had a lot of
problems with the user-profile in windows, where the path to the addin is
stored. Last year, I wanted to place the program-code in another folder,
and maybe, I want to rename the filename. Those two issues are very hard to
do, because when you start up Excel, you get an error message, and you can
not easily change the path or addin-name in the user-profile (Excel lacks
the possibility of removing (rather than unchecking) an addin in the list of
addins).

Question: are there contra-indications of working with an addin (or simply
"a code-holding file") which is not installed? For me, I see no problem,
code works fine, and even better, the addin is not loaded when I simple use
Excel to make another spreadsheet. I like to work so, but can you warn me
for things I do not foresee?

Thanks
Jos Vens